To avoid AT&T arbitration, your only choice is to not be a customer.
NYS Entity Status
NYS Filing Date
MAY 08, 2014
NYS DOS ID#
NYS Entity Type
DOMESTIC BUSINESS CORPORATION
2014 - GLOBAL ONE ARBITRATION, INC.
Around the Web
- AT&T: forced arbitration isn’t “forced” because no one has to buy service
By Jon Brodkin - Friday Jun 30, 2017
- A quietly indispensable Ranger signs for three more years
By Larry Brooks - Wednesday Jul 5, 2017
The Rangers took care of one piece of their remaining summer contract business on Wednesday, signing restricted free agent Jesper Fast to a three-year deal worth $1.85 million per after the winger had filed for salary arbitration. Mika Zibanejad, who has until 5 p.m. to file for salary arbitration, is the lone player off last...
- Court sounds skeptical of Wells Fargo’s overdraft fee defense
By Kevin Dugan - Friday Aug 25, 2017
A federal appeals court sounded very skeptical about Well Fargo’s eleventh-hour argument that more than 1 million depositors potentially hit with excessive overdraft fees should be forced individually to pursue a remedy through arbitration. The bank’s arbitration defense was raised well after the 2008 suit was filed — leading one jurist on the three-judge panel...
- Equifax Drops Controversial Condition From Free Credit Monitoring Service
By Chris Morran - Monday Sep 11, 2017
While the free credit monitoring service being offered by Equifax to the millions victims of its massive data breach leaves a lot to be desired, the company is remedying one of the more controversial aspects of the program — a condition that stripped consumers of their right to file a lawsuit in court.The EquifaxSecurity2017.com site set up in …
- Could the Rockaways Survive Another Sandy?
By LUIS FERRÉ-SADURNÍ - Thursday Jul 13, 2017
Residents are bracing for the worst, wondering whether measures taken so far are enough to keep devastation of the Queens community at bay.
- Waymo puts Uber lawyers in hot seat over trade-secret theft
By Joel Rosenblatt - Wednesday Jul 26, 2017
Waymo claims Uber Technologies Inc. had an accomplice in the theft of invaluable driverless technology trade secrets — the ride-hailing giant’s own lawyers.Waymo is aiming to use those details to buttress its claims Uber colluded with Levandowski to steal prized technology in the heated race to commercialize autonomous vehicles.Uber contends Waymo is mischaracterizing the actions of its outside lawyers, who it says did the right thing by hiring cyberforensics firm Stroz Friedberg to quarantine any sensitive information Levandowski had from Waymo or Google — and wall it off from Uber — during the due-diligence vetting of the Ottomotto acquisition.“MoFo and Stroz were retained for the very purpose of preventing any violation of intellectual property rights in connection with Uber’s acquisition of Ottomotto, and were contractually bound not to (and did not) disclose to Uber any confidential or proprietary Waymo information,” Uber argued in a court filing.In recent weeks, lawyers at another firm representing Uber — Boies, Schiller & Flexner — have taken on a more prominent role drafting court filings and representing the company in hearings.Waymo has also accused Stroz and Morrison of violating court orders to turn over proprietary information, including files from the law firm’s representation of Levandowski in arbitration proceedings brought by Google last year.Haag held her post as Northern California’s top prosecutor from 2010 to 2015 under President Barack Obama, leading one of the largest regional outposts of the Justice Department and one of the most active in white-collar prosecutions.